US secretary of state Marco Rubio spoke to CNN in the aftermath of the fallout from the White House.

He defended Donald Trump and JD Vance and repeated criticisms of Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s conduct in the White House – where he was present on Friday.

He also said recent press coverage of Ukrainians being left out by the US had frustrated the US administration ahead of the meeting.

Rubio described the Ukrainian president’s words as an “active open undermining of efforts to achieve peace”.

The senior US official went on to repeat the oft-said that President Trump is a “deal-maker”, saying he wouldn’t get “suckered” into a poor deal by Russia and Vladimir Putin.

“I have doubts that Zelenskyy’s willing to say and do the things we need in order to get a negotiation,” Rubio added.

The world watched in stunned silence as news broke of a tense phone call between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and French President Emmanuel Macron.

The call, shrouded in secrecy, followed a tumultuous period of escalating tensions between the two leaders and President Donald Trump. The details of the conversation remain unclear, but the immediate aftermath has sent shockwaves through the international community, with Zelenskyy canceling all planned events in Washington D.C.

The call, according to sources close to the Ukrainian president, was a direct response to a heated exchange between Zelenskyy and Trump during a recent meeting.

The nature of the disagreement remains unclear, but reports suggest that the two leaders clashed over Ukraine’s security and the ongoing conflict with Russia. The incident, which took place during a high-profile summit in Washington, has raised concerns about the future of the U.S.-Ukraine relationship.

Zelenskyy’s decision to cancel all planned events in Washington, including a scheduled meeting with U.S. lawmakers, has sent a clear message: the situation is far from resolved.

The Ukrainian president’s actions have been interpreted as a sign of deep frustration and a desire to distance himself from the Trump administration. This move has also raised questions about the future of U.S. support for Ukraine in the face of escalating tensions.

The fallout from the incident has been swift and dramatic. The White House has issued a statement, expressing concern over the escalating tensions and calling for a return to diplomacy.

However, the statement offered no concrete details about the nature of the disagreement or the future of the U.S.-Ukraine relationship.

The situation has also sparked a flurry of speculation about the future of the U.S. role in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Some analysts believe that the incident could lead to a shift in U.S. policy, with a greater emphasis on diplomacy and a more cautious approach to military intervention.

Others believe that the incident could further strain relations between the U.S. and Russia, potentially leading to a more dangerous escalation of the conflict.

The call between Zelenskyy and Macron has also raised questions about the role of France in the ongoing conflict. France has been a vocal supporter of Ukraine, providing military and humanitarian aid.

The call suggests that Macron is playing a crucial role in mediating between the U.S. and Ukraine, and potentially seeking to find a diplomatic solution to the escalating tensions.

The situation in Washington is far from settled. The cancellation of Zelenskyy’s events has sent a clear message: the future of the U.S.-Ukraine relationship is uncertain.

The call between Zelenskyy and Macron, coupled with the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, has created a volatile and unpredictable situation. The world is watching closely, waiting to see how the situation unfolds and what impact it will have on the global landscape.

The incident has also highlighted the complex and often volatile nature of international relations. The clash between Zelenskyy and Trump, and the subsequent call between Zelenskyy and Macron, serve as a stark reminder of the challenges and complexities of navigating international politics in the 21st century.

The world is left to grapple with the implications of this incident, and the potential for further escalation in the conflict.

The future of the U.S.-Ukraine relationship, and the role of France in the ongoing conflict, remain uncertain. The world is watching closely, waiting to see how the situation unfolds and what impact it will have on the global landscape.

The incident has also highlighted the complex and often volatile nature of international relations, reminding us that diplomacy and communication are crucial in navigating the challenges of the 21st century.