Megyn Kelly Slams Blake Lively’s Time100 Honor as ‘Absurd’: ‘She Has No Influence’

 

In a recent public discussion, Megyn Kelly voiced her strong skepticism regarding Blake Lively’s recognition as one of Time’s 100 most influential people in 2025. Known for her outspoken nature, Kelly did not hold back, labeling the accolade as “absurd” and expressing disbelief about Lively’s supposed influence within the entertainment industry. During an interview, Kelly raised the question of whether Lively’s recent controversies overshadow her accomplishments, suggesting that the actress’s most recent legal troubles undermine her credibility and effectiveness as a public figure.

A Closer Look at Blake Lively’s Influence

 

Blake Lively, a celebrated actress known for her roles in popular films and  television series, attended the illustrious Time 100 Gala, where she delivered an emotional speech about her journey. In her address, she took a moment to discuss her mother’s ordeal and survival through trauma, emphasizing the power of a woman’s voice in today’s society. Despite the personal turmoil she faces, including her recent legal battles, Lively articulated the responsibility that comes with being labeled influential.

Her speech resonated with many, as she highlighted how individual experiences can ripple through communities, influencing others in profound ways. Lively’s commitment to awareness and advocacy, particularly regarding women’s rights and representation in media, adds layers to her acknowledgment by Time. Yet, Kelly’s critique brings forward a questioning of whether Lively’s influence is genuine or merely a result of her celebrity status.

The Legal Battles: Impact on Perception

The context surrounding Blake Lively’s recognition comes amid a complicated legal situation involving her co-star Justin Baldoni. Lively has taken legal action against Baldoni, alleging sexual harassment and emotional distress—a series of claims that Baldoni vehemently denies. In fact, Baldoni has countersued, claiming defamation, and even bringing Lively’s husband Ryan Reynolds and their publicist into the fray. These lawsuits have made headlines, sparking discussions about the implications of such high-profile issues in celebrity culture and the entertainment world at large.

As Megyn Kelly scrutinizes Lively’s Time recognition, it becomes clear that the conversation is deeply intertwined with the ongoing dialogues about accountability, virtue signaling, and the complexities of influence in a digital era. Kelly’s assertions that Lively is allegedly fabricating allegations against Baldoni as part of a personal agenda raise eyebrows, intensifying the focus on the blurred lines between genuine advocacy and personal vendettas.

Influence vs. Celebrity: The Ongoing Debate

This critique from Kelly has sparked a broader conversation about the nature of influence in the entertainment community. In an age where social media amplifies voices, it poses the question: what does it mean to be influential? Celebrities like Blake Lively wield significant visibility; however, this visibility does not always equate to impactful influence or authority in sensitive matters like those surrounding women’s rights and issues of harassment.

Kelly’s stance brings forth an important perspective: it can be claimed that merely being in the spotlight does not afford one the authority to be deemed influential. The juxtaposition of Lively’s accolades against her ongoing legal challenges adds an intricate layer to discussions around celebrity culture. Are actresses who face personal controversies truly influential doctors of change, or are they simply products of media narratives?

The conversation surrounding Lively’s recognition by Time comes at a pivotal moment for both the #MeToo movement and public perception of celebrities involved in legal struggles. This scenario illustrates the complexities of being an influential figure—how personal battles can shape public perception and raise questions about the authenticity of one’s influence.

Conclusion

Megyn Kelly’s critique of Blake Lively’s Time 100 honor demonstrates the ongoing debate over influence, authenticity, and the ramifications of celebrity culture. As we unravel the layers of this discourse, it’s important to consider the implications: Are celebrities like Lively capable of wielding true influence, or does fame overshadow genuine contributions to society? As discussions continue, it’s important for audiences to remain engaged and question the narratives presented to us. Share your thoughts on the topic and let’s keep the conversation alive!