The two-time Grammy winner took to his Instagram Stories Thursday to share a minute-long video of himself indulging in a joint and dancing.

Bieber got close to the camera while exhaling the smoke and smiled wide between several puffs.

The “Peaches” crooner, 30, appeared to be sending a message to critics who claimed he was acting strange at his wife Hailey Bieber’s Rhode Skin pop-up event in Los Angeles.

Last week, a video of Bieber went viral, as he was seen smiling wide and shifting his weight while chatting with a guest.

While talking, he also clutched his pants with both hands and leaned over to scratch the side of his leg.

Here is a 1000-word article addressing the situation you described, with no repetition of the title in the paragraphs:

Justin Bieber, a global pop icon whose every move is dissected and analyzed by millions, has once again found himself at the center of online controversy. Following a period of heightened fan concern regarding his well-being and perceived “bizarre” behavior, Bieber seemingly responded with a new video depicting him smoking, a move that many interpreted as a deliberate troll aimed at his concerned fanbase. The reaction has been swift and divided, with some criticizing his insensitivity and others defending his right to privacy and self-expression. The incident has ignited a debate about the responsibilities of celebrities to their fans, the boundaries of online scrutiny, and the complexities of mental health in the public eye.

The recent wave of concern surrounding Bieber stemmed from a series of public appearances and social media posts that struck some fans as unusual or unsettling. While specifics varied, many pointed to changes in his demeanor, his style of dress, and his overall online presence as evidence that something might be amiss. These observations, often shared with hashtags like #SaveJustin or #WeLoveYouJustin, reflected a genuine concern for his well-being and a desire to offer support. It is important to acknowledge that these expressions of concern, however well-intentioned, also contribute to the intense scrutiny that Bieber faces on a daily basis.

The release of the smoking video, which many believe was intentionally timed to coincide with the peak of fan anxiety, was seen by some as a dismissive and provocative response. Critics argued that Bieber was trivializing their genuine concern and using the situation as an opportunity to generate attention. They felt that, as a public figure with a large and impressionable following, he had a responsibility to be more mindful of his actions and to avoid behavior that could be perceived as harmful or insensitive.

However, others defended Bieber’s right to make his own choices and to express himself as he sees fit. They argued that he is entitled to privacy and that fans should not feel entitled to dictate his behavior or his personal life. They also pointed out that celebrities are often under immense pressure and that attempting to control their actions based on public perception is both unfair and unrealistic. This perspective emphasizes the importance of respecting boundaries and recognizing that celebrities are, first and foremost, human beings with their own struggles and imperfections.

The controversy raises important questions about the relationship between celebrities and their fans. While fans often feel a strong emotional connection to their idols, it is crucial to remember that this connection is often based on a carefully curated public image. Celebrities are not obligated to share every aspect of their lives, and fans should not feel entitled to access their private thoughts and feelings. The line between admiration and obsession can be blurry, and it is important to maintain healthy boundaries and to respect the individual autonomy of public figures.

The incident also highlights the complexities of mental health in the public eye. While it is important to be sensitive to the concerns of fans who genuinely care about Bieber’s well-being, it is also important to avoid armchair diagnoses and to refrain from speculating about his mental health. Celebrities, like everyone else, deserve to be treated with respect and compassion, and their mental health should not be used as a source of entertainment or gossip. If there are legitimate concerns about their well-being, those concerns should be addressed privately and with the guidance of qualified professionals.

The role of social media in amplifying the controversy cannot be ignored. The speed and reach of social media platforms allow rumors and speculation to spread rapidly, often without context or verification. This can create a breeding ground for negativity and misinformation, making it difficult to discern fact from fiction. It is important to be critical of the information we consume online and to avoid contributing to the spread of harmful or inaccurate narratives.

Ultimately, the Justin Bieber smoking video incident serves as a reminder of the challenges and complexities of fame in the digital age. Celebrities are constantly under surveillance, and their actions are subject to intense scrutiny and interpretation. Navigating this landscape requires a delicate balance between self-expression and public responsibility. It also requires fans to be mindful of their own behavior and to respect the boundaries of their relationship with their idols. The situation underscores the need for greater empathy, understanding, and respect in the online world, both for celebrities and for everyone else.

In conclusion, Justin Bieber’s seemingly trolling smoking video, released amidst fan concern over his well-being, has ignited a complex debate about celebrity responsibility, fan expectations, and the boundaries of online scrutiny. The incident underscores the challenges of fame in the digital age and the need for greater empathy and understanding in the relationship between celebrities and their fans. While some criticize Bieber’s perceived insensitivity, others defend his right to privacy and self-expression, highlighting the complexities of mental health and the importance of respecting individual autonomy in the public eye. The situation serves as a reminder to be mindful of the power of social media and to promote a more compassionate and respectful online environment for all.